What’s new
The platform’s journey
The Organizational Memory Platform™ matures along an eight-stage developmental ladder. Each stage changes what the platform can do for an organization’s architectural decisions. Together they describe the path from a captured decision register to an organizational brain.
Where Gateway Architect is today: Stage 3 of 8 shipped.
The ordering is not aspirational sequencing. Each stage is structurally dependent on the prior: synapses (Stage 2) cannot exist without encoded decisions (Stage 1); recall (Stage 3) cannot exist without synapses to recall along; consolidation (Stage 4) cannot exist without structured supersession; and so on. Competitors approaching from adjacent positions arrive at Stage 1 and must traverse the same dependencies in the same order.
Encoding
ShippedShipped 2026-05-18 (v1.2.0)
Decisions are captured as structured records. The closed loop (Discovery, ADR, Generated Code, PR) is the act of recording. Memory traces are laid down.
Read more →Synaptic Structure
ShippedShipped 2026-06-02 (v1.3.0)
Decisions are wired together with typed relationships: supersedes, requires, constrains, contradicts, extends, implements, related-to. A decision in isolation is data; a decision with synapses is knowledge.
Read more →Associative Recall
CurrentShipped 2026-07-02 (v1.4.0) · Current stage
Relevant context surfaces at the moment new decisions are being made, not after. The platform exposes this recall layer as an API that code generators can consume. The OMP™ becomes infrastructure under every AI tool in the stack, not a destination product.
Read more →Consolidation
RoadmapDecisions are tagged with implementation outcomes. The corpus stops being uniformly weighted. Validated decisions carry stronger signal than abandoned ones.
Pattern Abstraction
RoadmapSemantic memory layers on episodic memory. The platform stops only recording individual decisions and starts proposing reusable patterns drawn from the corpus.
Metacognition
RoadmapThe platform models what the organization knows and what it does not know. Confidence scoring on retrieved patterns. Identification of architectural blind spots.
Theory of Mind
AspirationalThe platform models the perspectives of different stakeholders: the CTO, the compliance officer, the platform team, the security team. It can anticipate how a decision will land with each role before they react to it.
Generative Agency
AspirationalThe platform initiates decisions, not just supports them. Architectural debt and compliance drift are surfaced as drafted ADRs ready for the architect’s governance.